Revision round 1 of 5
Original venue reviews guide the first revision
V₀→V₁
Feedback received
What entered this round
Four human venue reviews of the original submission
- Generalization beyond the constrained Sokoban environment is unclear.
- All experiments are LLM-to-LLM; translation to human–AI interaction is unknown.
- The paper provides little guidance on improving vigilance mechanisms.
AppliedScientist response
Decision-point evaluation and vigilance prompting study
AppliedScientist extends the evaluation beyond the original full-game setting and adds an intervention that directly tests whether prompting can improve resistance to malicious advice.
- Decision-point Sokoban: 8 positions × 5 repetitions.
- Explicit awareness improves resistance by 32.5 percentage points in this experiment.
- A cross-domain trivia extension and no-planner results are included.
Resulting evidence
What was completed—and what was not
Experiments performedAnalysis addedHuman baseline
Still open: The requested human baseline is not completed in this round.
Resulting review6/10
AI Reviewer evaluation of V₁